RE: Is being the first enough?
10/21/2005; 10:34 AM
No. I don't suppose it is enough. But let me be picky. Enough of what? We all seem to intuitively know what enough means. It means sufficient for the most optimum benefit. That is: good just because of the one thing held.... primacy. It is therefore prime.. premium... primus..primary...primitive..? What about primitive? or aboriginal? That is first. And also in this culture the "primary" denotation of "gone" over with... caput! So as in the case of africa.. caput! It may have been first but (It is the land of the darkies) those people with plates in their lips and umpteen bones in their noses!! " "them thar dern ugly dirty people who can't build a good old American style civilization" (the sarcasm started some lines back) Well anyway, the point of course is that the relativity of first or last is just that; relative to your thoughts about the matter, and, wholey prejudicial. And what is the meaning of prejudice?? judging FIRST; AND thinking LAST.... if at all.
Stephen O'Kelley Deadsalive.blogspot celibacy. blogspot Thank you, ps: very good website! keep up the good work.
Filed Under:


